|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pandora

In County Government Rich Get Richer Secretly


by Scott D. Yost
County Editor
Pages 1 2
November 21, 2012
Guilford County government put a freeze on merit pay raises for all Guilford County employees four years ago, and, in the 2012-2013 budget no money could be found to fund raises for the county's roughly 2,300 employees. However, in an off-budget move that took place entirely behind the scenes recently, a host of Guilford County department heads have just received significant raises.

The message from the county's decision makers to county employees in the budget adopted this year was the same message as in the last three years: Guilford County is sorry but money is just too tight to award merit raises to county employees. Before 2009, those raises were, year after year, awarded like clockwork to virtually all county employees.

So it might seem like magic that Guilford County has suddenly managed to find money to give some county directors raises – of up to $9,000 annually – in the middle of a fiscal year when the county hit citizens with a large tax hike and included no money in the budget for employee merit raises.

However, sources familiar with the mechanics of the raises say that no magic was used – just some fancy footwork along with creative ways of finding extra money in a county budget that supposedly had been cut to the bone before the Board of Commissioners adopted it in June.

In internal discussions, the pay increases are not being referred to as "raises," which the county has supposedly had on hold for years. Instead, the pay increases are classified as "parity salary adjustments." Webster's Dictionary defines a raise as "an increase in wages or salary."

According to a county department head who asked not to be identified (and who is not getting a raise), the Guilford County Human Resources Department has been conducting parity studies of salaries to determine the size of the salary increases for the county department heads who received the recent raises. The department head said that, in cases where the county conducted a study and found that Guilford County directors weren't receiving pay comparable to directors in similar positions in other local governments, "salary adjustments" were made. That is, raises were given – under the justification that all Guilford County department heads whose pay is out of line with those in other counties deserve to be compensated fairly.

There is no indication that department heads' salaries were cut when it was discovered that their salaries were higher than the salaries of those in similar positions in other local governments.

Those raises are reflected in the affected directors' most recent paychecks. However, there has been no public discussion or notification of the raises.

According to one Guilford County commissioner, the Board of Commissioners was presented with the raises for the department directors in a closed session at a recent commissioners meeting. County officials are legally allowed to meet behind closed doors to discuss certain personnel issues – such as performance of county department heads and other employees. However, the salaries and raises of directors and all other county employees are by law a matter of public record, and non-performance based raises cannot legally be discussed in closed session.

In the past – prior to the financial meltdown in fall 2008 – whenever the Board of Commissioners awarded raises to directors, the commissioners went into closed session, reviewed the performance of that director, had a private discussion on the matter, and then the board came out in open session and took a public vote to award the raise.

This time around, the commissioners never took a public vote to award the raises for the department heads, nor has the matter been discussed publicly in any way.

One commissioner told The Rhinoceros Times that the board was presented in closed session with a list of county directors affected and the amounts of the "salary adjustments." However, the commissioner said they weren't allowed to keep a copy of the list. The lists of the pay increases were collected from the commissioners by county staff at the end of the closed session presentation.

Thankfully for the county from a public relations standpoint, both Guilford County Manager Brenda Jones Fox and Assistant Manager Sharisse Fuller weren't on the list of directors receiving raises.

In addition to being the county's assistant manager, Fuller is the county's director of human resources – the department that conducted the parity studies that are being used to justify the raises.

Fox came under fire earlier this year for finagling a large retirement bonus for herself and other long-time county employees without making that move clear to the commissioners, who voted down the bonuses after they found out about them.

On Friday morning, Nov. 16, The Rhinoceros Times requested a list of the county department heads who have received raises.

The directors who got raises are as follows: Guilford County Finance Director Reid Baker's salary went from $128,600 to $135,000; Sheriff BJ Barnes went from $137,493 to $142,000; Tax Director Ben Chavis got an increase from $105,600 to $113,000 a year; Security Director Jeff Fowler's salary increased from $80,133 to $87,000; Elections Director George Gilbert went from $97,372 to $99,319; Budget Director Mike Halford went from $112,013 to $120,000; Facilities Director Fred Jones went from $99,961 to $109,000; Child Support/Court Services Director Renee Kenan went from $102,950 to $110,000; Juvenile Detention Director Doug Logan got a raise from $78,917 to $86,500; County Attorney Mark Payne went from $148,600 to $153,000; Emergency Services Director Alan Perdue went from $107,532 to $115,000; Internal Audit Director Martha Rogers went from $101,154 to $110,000; Register of Deeds Jeff Thigpen got an increase from $107,438 to $109,586; Clerk to the Board Effie Varitimidis went from $77,850 to $81,500; and Social Services Director Robert Williams went from $125,778 to $140,000.

The raises come at a time when there have been a lot of strange last-minute actions by the out-going Guilford County government that's currently controlled by Fox and the Democratic majority on the board.

On Monday, Dec. 3, Chairman of the Board of Commissioners Skip Alston is stepping down as a commissioner, and, as a result of the Nov. 6 election, the board will have a Republican majority. Fox is retiring on Feb. 1, which – along with the new Board of Commissioners – means big leadership changes are coming soon for county government.

In the final months of the reign of Guilford County by Fox and the Democrats, the county leaders on the way out – in concert with some who will still be around – have been busy bees, attempting to deal with many matters that seem to involve favors or funding for well connected people and causes.

For instance, Fox had a failed attempt to quickly push through a rezoning of the Guilford County Prison Farm so the land could be transformed into a corporate park, and, at the Thursday, Nov. 15 commissioners meeting, the board, in a nearly unprecedented move, approved $200,000 in funding for the High Point Area Arts Council to purchase a headquarters in High Point.

...continued on page 2
Pages 1 2

printPrint
emailEmail Link
CommentFeedback
shareShare

Tags: Guilford County

  1. print email
    In County Government Rich Get Richer Secretly
    November 21, 2012 | 06:22 AM

    I would like to know who voted for this increase. I know Billy Yow didn't since he is against everything that cost money. I hoping you won't prove me wrong. I

    GSO Citzens
  2. print email
    Fuller can call it parity, most of us call it baloney.
    November 22, 2012 | 12:38 PM

    If there was any legitimate parity study done then many of us county employees got left way behind! This is just an extension of Fox's golden parachute. Those that got the raises either kissed her behind to meet Skip's agenda or she is kissing theirs on the way out to make up for the trouble she's caused them over the past few years. Anyone in government knows your retirement pay is based on the average of your highest years of pay. It's common knowledge that many of those that got the raises plan to retire with Fox or soon after. Its really no surprise. It's sort of like watching 6 or 8 people stand around to watch 1 or 2 dig a trench. The ones watching get the raise and the praise while the ones doing all the work suffer through.

    Not Surprised
  3. print email
    Guilford County Parity Salary Adjustments
    November 24, 2012 | 03:17 PM

    What a slap in the face to DSS employees! After the employees have been denied a raise for the last 4 years, the Director of DSS receives a $14,000 salary increase. Call it what you want... parity salary adjustment...it's still a raise. This is as dirty as you can get. :0(

    Diane Poe
  4. print email
    Rich get Richer
    November 27, 2012 | 04:37 PM

    The actions of the board is an example why the nation is in the mess it is in. The money given out was a jab to the new members coming in, WASTE MONEY. I am glad people like Hank, Jerry and Jeff are coming in, if they save money then my taxes go down, Best of luck guys.

    Sal Leone
  5. print email
    And we've been asked to cut 15%
    November 28, 2012 | 09:03 AM

    With departments being asked to cut 15% (which will be employees) this is absolutely disgusting. What a slap in the face for all County Employees and hopefully everyone will let their disgust reflect in their work! This is the straw that breaks our slaving backs...We can only hope these people retire because about 90% of them are pathetic directors anyway and need to be booted out of here. Really only Jeff Thigpen, Halford and Alan Perdue are worth keeping..

    GC Employee
  6. print email
    November 28, 2012 | 11:08 AM

    You have individuals being hired making more than individuals who have been employed for years with the County. You have directors that don't look after their employees. They have no push or drive for equality and these studies are needed in EVERY department and on every individual employee. Yet our focus is on the top salary individuals. Where are the directors standing up for their employees? HR needs to be doing this "parity study" and also a "salary compression" study for every employee. Perhaps the county employees should walk out and tell the high paying directors to do the job themselves. The morale in this county government is already extremely low and now it will be sent over the edge.

    County Depts Unite!
  7. print email
    November 28, 2012 | 11:09 AM

    Someone please tell me why a raise would be given to those individuals who are getting ready to retire. Fred Jones, Perdue, etc. they are all retiring and yet they get a raise?

    Those People Are Retiring
  8. print email
    GC Director's Pay Adjustments
    November 28, 2012 | 01:39 PM

    As the spouse of a GC employee, I take these adjustments as a slap in the face to every member of my family. I find it appalling that the exiting Director of Emergency Services gets a raise just three months shy of his retirement and an employee under him making a mere $40,000 can't get a raise in 4 years. Insurance premiums go up every year but not even as much as a cost of living increase for these folks. Guilford County will never be able to retain good, educated talent with practices like this- they will simply be a stepping stone on a resume!

    Spouse of GC Employee
  9. print email
    Unfair
    November 28, 2012 | 10:15 PM

    ANY department head that took this "Parity Adjustment" and didn't send it back is a weak leader. They should have sent it back and told Fox and the board of clowns that if their employees couldn't get a raise, they didn't want one either. This was totally disrespectful to the county employees and shows a total lack of caring by the county manager and commissioners. The employees of Guilford County should go on strike and let the manager, commissioners and department heads earn their money taking care of the citizens.
    These folks hurt their employees. 1st they changed their pay schedule, resulting in LESS money each month, then they stopped their pay raises, then increased their insurance premiums. Next they cut the number of employees forcing each employee to do more, then gave the NON-WORKERS pay raises. What is next? Pay cuts to cover these increases? And they don't know what the new board may recommend!

  10. print email
    Raises in GC: Not a new thing
    December 18, 2012 | 09:50 AM

    Guilford County has been giving these parity raises for years, but it fell under the radar, because it wasn't so much to the people at the top.

    In years past, if you were buddy-buddy with your manager, he/she may find a way to "retain" you by giving a parity raise. Several Quality Assurance Specialists recieved raises in the amount of over $2000 between 2011 and 2012.

    Now I guess they just decided to apply that principal to the real money makers.

    Observer
  11. print email
    iwantmoreanddamthetaxpayer
    December 19, 2012 | 08:55 PM

    Quality Assurance Specialists?
    Obviously not in charge of assured quality in leadership by officials.

    Observer
  12. print email
    adjustments
    December 19, 2012 | 09:01 PM

    Guilford County Schools has ways around "no pay raises" for special employees too.
    How much do their media production people add up to btw.
    Those TV spots are so well watched,right?

    Raises
Reader Feedback Submission
Use this form to submit Reader Feedback. Your submission will be reviewed by our staff before appearing on the Web site.
* required value
Your Name

Subject

Comment*

Verification*


PharmQuest
Rhino Search